Urea Soluble Prills 46-0-0

Introducing Elixir Gardens Urea Fertiliser, a powerful solution to help your crops thrive and reach their full potential. Packed with 46% nitrogen content, our product is like a super-boost for your plants, giving them the essential nutrient they need to grow strong and healthy. What&#;s special about our fertiliser is that it comes in small, easy-to-use prills that dissolve quickly in water. This means when you apply it to your soil, it spreads evenly, making sure every plant gets the nutrients it needs.

Mineral Analysis:

Total Nitrogen (N) 46.0% Ureic Nitrogen 46.0% Particle Size: 90% between 1.0mm and 4.0mm

Application Rates:

As a Soluble Fertiliser &#; dissolve 12.5 &#; 15g per 2 litres of water per sqm during the active growing season. As a Granular Fertiliser &#; For lawns Use at a rate of 12.5-15g per sqm during the active growing season. For Fruiting Plants use use at a rate of 5-10g per sqm when fruits begin to set. For Root Vegetables use at a rate of 3-7g per sqm at planting time or during early tuber formation. NOTE: Application rates supplied are general guidelines only and will vary depending on environmental, weather and ground/soil conditions. To offer the best possible value &#; smaller weight bags are repackaged into clear packaging with a black and white label with all relevant information detailed and larger quantities will be supplied in manufacturer&#;s bags. Tubs will be plain white with a black and white label with all relevant information detailed. Images shown are for illustrative purposes only.  

Check our our fantastic range of FERTILISERS here.

Introducing Elixir Gardens Urea Fertiliser, a powerful solution to help your crops thrive and reach their full potential. Packed with 46% nitrogen content, our product is like a super-boost for your plants, giving them the essential nutrient they need to grow strong and healthy. What&#;s special about our fertiliser is that it comes in small, easy-to-use prills that dissolve quickly in water. This means when you apply it to your soil, it spreads evenly, making sure every plant gets the nutrients it needs.Total Nitrogen (N) 46.0% Ureic Nitrogen 46.0% Particle Size: 90% between 1.0mm and 4.0mmAs a Soluble Fertiliser &#; dissolve 12.5 &#; 15g per 2 litres of water per sqm during the active growing season. As a Granular Fertiliser &#; For lawns Use at a rate of 12.5-15g per sqm during the active growing season. For Fruiting Plants use use at a rate of 5-10g per sqm when fruits begin to set. For Root Vegetables use at a rate of 3-7g per sqm at planting time or during early tuber formation.Application rates supplied are general guidelines only and will vary depending on environmental, weather and ground/soil conditions. To offer the best possible value &#; smaller weight bags are repackaged into clear packaging with a black and white label with all relevant information detailed and larger quantities will be supplied in manufacturer&#;s bags. Tubs will be plain white with a black and white label with all relevant information detailed. Images shown are for illustrative purposes only.

Goto Shuanglian to know more.

Maddog66 said:

I buy bagged fertilizer. I apply nitrogen after a few weeks of growth to the things that need it and then maybe a light shot a little later if I see yellowing.

I actually thought most commercial nitrogen was derived from Nat Gas? Can you expound on the different sources and their usefulness in plotting?

My related question is&#;&#;..If you get a soil test and then amend your soil exactly as it recommends for the intended crop, without any thought at all to the sources of it, is it possible to do &#;harm&#;?

For more urea 46-0-0 nitrogen fertilizerinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.

Click to expand...

I've kinda let this post slide as I'm not sure how valuable a dive into the rabbit hole might be. So, thanks for the question. I'm not a chemist and the actual "how" of production of different synthetic nitrogen fertilizers I only understand from reading. Hydrogen gas is the starting point and most of it does come from natural gas although there are other minor sources. Atmospheric nitrogen is reacted with the hydrogen to form ammonia.

Again, just dealing here with synthetic nitrogen. There are different forms of fertilizer - liquid & dry for example - each with different N-P-K analyses. Everyone has its place and understanding the place is essential in production agriculture. For food plots? I guess its economics and preference. This conversation can get real long in a hurry!

Urea (46-0-0), ammonium nitrate (34-0-0) and ammonium sulfate (21-0-0-24) are the top three dry fertilizers by tonnage sold.
I guess everyone here is familiar with urea. So far it has been the cheapest form of dry-form nitrogen, but rising natural gas prices are going to crimp it's style.
Ammonium nitrate was the preferred N source for me back before it became a regulated explosive.
Ammonium sulfate is a great way to add nitrogen and sulfur to you soil.

And there's anhydrous ammonia, a gaseous liquid (or is it the other way around) which I doubt anyone uses for food plots.

The ammoniated phosphorous fertilizers like MAP (mono-ammonium phosphate) and DAP (diammonium phosphate) have a place, too.
MAP analysis is 10% nitrogen, 52% phosphorous (more or less) - 10-52-0
DAP is 18% N, 46% P - 18-46-0. Sometimes they are used in their native form but mostly are blended with other N, P, and K sources for bulk application or are bagged as a standard analysis fertilize like 10-10-10 or 19-19-19.

How to say this? I guess we all know soil nitrogen doesn't stay in the soil like phosphorous and potassium. Over some short period of time (weeks and/or months and NOT days) it will either be used by plants, washed out of the soil (down) or lost into the air. The number of weeks and months is dependent not only on the type of N fertilizer but also on soil type, air and soil temperature, relative humidity, rainfall amounts and the relative dryness of the soil at the time of application.

The dramatic concern about loss of urea based N is much overblown in my opinion. There's much to consider, too much for this post. The worst possible losses occur at extremely high temperatures, high relative humidity and low soil moistures - a time when you are not interested in N application! The worst case loss I've seen documented in research is 25%. If you back it off to more average environment considerations urea losses are comparable to other N sources.

This is a crop /food production reference - I've read that only half of the world's crops are fertilized with any N source and that half of the N applied in crop production is lost. Point is, you can try to manage some of the loss, but eventually you will lose.

The other problem with nitrogen fertilizers is the soil acidification. But without getting into it too deep it's just a factor that needs to be managed. I hate to use the worst-to-best comparison. While the differences between fertilizers is a consideration it's just another thing to manage.

To your question about harm? I don't know the answer because it's difficult to determine the meaning of harm. If there's debate about synthetic fertilizers versus organics my personal opinion is there are pluses and minuses to each approach. At the grocery I buy organic tomatoes and non-organic apples ... or vice versa. It drives the checkout person crazy. He/she will say, "Do you know your apples are organic and your tomatoes are not?" My response is I support all kinds of agricultural (or food plot) production.

We can go deeper. Somebody else offer an observation or perception?

I've kinda let this post slide as I'm not sure how valuable a dive into the rabbit hole might be. So, thanks for the question. I'm not a chemist and the actual "how" of production of different synthetic nitrogen fertilizers I only understand from reading. Hydrogen gas is the starting point and most of it does come from natural gas although there are other minor sources. Atmospheric nitrogen is reacted with the hydrogen to form ammonia.Again, just dealing here with synthetic nitrogen. There are different forms of fertilizer - liquid & dry for example - each with different N-P-K analyses. Everyone has its place and understanding the place is essential in production agriculture. For food plots? I guess its economics and preference. This conversation can get real long in a hurry!Urea (46-0-0), ammonium nitrate (34-0-0) and ammonium sulfate (21-0-0-24) are the top three dry fertilizers by tonnage sold.I guess everyone here is familiar with urea. So far it has been the cheapest form of dry-form nitrogen, but rising natural gas prices are going to crimp it's style.Ammonium nitrate was the preferred N source for me back before it became a regulated explosive.Ammonium sulfate is a great way to add nitrogen and sulfur to you soil.And there's anhydrous ammonia, a gaseous liquid (or is it the other way around) which I doubt anyone uses for food plots.The ammoniated phosphorous fertilizers like MAP (mono-ammonium phosphate) and DAP (diammonium phosphate) have a place, too.MAP analysis is 10% nitrogen, 52% phosphorous (more or less) - 10-52-0DAP is 18% N, 46% P - 18-46-0. Sometimes they are used in their native form but mostly are blended with other N, P, and K sources for bulk application or are bagged as a standard analysis fertilize like 10-10-10 or 19-19-19.How to say this? I guess we all know soil nitrogen doesn't stay in the soil like phosphorous and potassium. Over some short period of time (weeks and/or months and NOT days) it will either be used by plants, washed out of the soil (down) or lost into the air. The number of weeks and months is dependent not only on the type of N fertilizer but also on soil type, air and soil temperature, relative humidity, rainfall amounts and the relative dryness of the soil at the time of application.The dramatic concern about loss of urea based N is much overblown in my opinion. There's much to consider, too much for this post. The worst possible losses occur at extremely high temperatures, high relative humidity and low soil moistures - a time when you are not interested in N application! The worst case loss I've seen documented in research is 25%. If you back it off to more average environment considerations urea losses are comparable to other N sources.This is a crop /food production reference - I've read that only half of the world's crops are fertilized with any N source and that half of the N applied in crop production is lost. Point is, you can try to manage some of the loss, but eventually you will lose.The other problem with nitrogen fertilizers is the soil acidification. But without getting into it too deep it's just a factor that needs to be managed. I hate to use the worst-to-best comparison. While the differences between fertilizers is a consideration it's just another thing to manage.To your question about harm? I don't know the answer because it's difficult to determine the meaning of harm. If there's debate about synthetic fertilizers versus organics my personal opinion is there are pluses and minuses to each approach. At the grocery I buy organic tomatoes and non-organic apples ... or vice versa. It drives the checkout person crazy. He/she will say, "Do you know your apples are organic and your tomatoes are not?" My response is I support all kinds of agricultural (or food plot) production.We can go deeper. Somebody else offer an observation or perception?

Are you interested in learning more about ammonium sulphate granular? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!